CryptoPainter

CryptoPainter

An old friend calls me a "painter", technical/data analysis and quantitative trading, providing various tricky angles to see the market, and using time to leverage.

32Following
3.1Kfollowers

Feed

CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
Successfully captured lightning striking the sea in slow motion! Tropical thunderstorms are really quite frequent...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
I miss those days... A few of us would stay up all night at the internet cafe, first playing CS, then after getting tired, we would play Red Alert, then some rounds of Need for Speed multiplayer, and finally, we would open CS again to mess around with knives...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
I accidentally updated Openclaw just now, and as a result... The Gateway won't open, the process disconnects instantly, and after struggling for a long time to find that it can't be fixed, I had to sadly put down this lobster I've been raising for 3 months... Steamed, and I added garlic...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
Not being blacklisted by major economists yet indicates a successful transformation...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
1.3 million views also generated $200 in revenue... The average revenue per 10,000 views reached an astonishing $1.60... So just speaking plainly is enough! After a vacation of more than a month, I'm going to play for another week before heading home, and then it's full throttle, back to live streaming!
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
For those friends who think that just having AI Coding means they are about to achieve financial freedom, let me recommend a few buckets of cold water from Huajiao... If you read every word, at the very least, you can avoid stepping into 10 major pitfalls of quantitative trading. AI Trading is fun, but a model without a data foundation is essentially a black box. From a quantitative perspective, this is the same; writing a nice-looking factor or backtesting a beautiful curve is really easy... But to withstand the test of time and not lose money is truly difficult... Want to make stable profits over a long period? It's even harder...
pepper 花椒
pepper 花椒
There are already multiple projects asking me to test their AI trading frameworks. Let me just say a few points: 1. Present long-term real trading results; short-term meme coins without max drawdown don't mean anything, it's just survivor bias. Pick any coin that has already gone to zero and backtest it, the curve will look just as beautiful. 2. If the Sharpe ratio > 5, it can basically be determined that it is overfitting, look-ahead bias, or data leakage. Medallion usually only has 2-3, and if you’re getting 7 at home, you should be aware of that. 3. Testing with data from a crypto bull market is different from backtesting with data from major markets; it’s complete overfitting, and I generally don’t consider it. At the very least, it should work through the two bear markets of 2018 and 2022, and then run a walk-forward test to count as a strategy. 4. Transaction fees, slippage, and funding rates must be included. When you layer in Binance's maker/taker fees, VIP tiers, and BNB discounts, if the model is inaccurate, the backtest and real trading can differ by a factor of two in annualized returns, which is normal. 5. Strategy capacity is more worth watching than return rate. Just because it can handle $100,000 doesn’t mean it can handle $1,000,000. The depth of small coins is limited; when you enter the market, you can wipe out your own signals, which the backtest cannot reflect at all. 6. Indeed, crypto quant isn’t that competitive, but arbitrage opportunities are constantly being eroded—funding arbitrage, spot-futures basis, inter-exchange price differences have basically been cleaned out by market makers and HFTs. High-frequency trading is not feasible, and pure factors have no space left; the only paths left are trend and mean reversion. 7. Alpha has a half-life. If a strategy can still run after three months, it’s considered passing; if it lasts six months, it’s considered good; if it lasts a year, it’s likely just luck or your scale hasn’t reached a noticeable level. Don’t mistake the benefits of a single bull run for perpetual alpha; you’re not that impressive yet. 8. The "optimal parameters" from grid search are 99% overfitted. The truly stable parameters are those that can run regardless of the range you pick, not just those that work when fine-tuned to two decimal places. Parameter robustness is a hundred times more important than single-point returns; anyone who has done this understands. 9. The market structures of 2017 ICOs, 2020 DeFi summer, 2021 memes, 2022 LUNA/FTX, and 2023 AI narratives are completely different. The "patterns" you fitted in the previous phase can go to zero in a different regime, and you’ll even lose on fees. 10. Exchange risks are always bigger than you think. FTX going to zero, API rate limits, flash crashes, small exchanges running away, Binance suddenly delisting—these are all "one-time game-enders." You can’t withstand a single exchange disaster with a 50% annualized return; it doesn’t matter how great your strategy is, if you’re trading altcoins, you need to consider liquidity and "delisting risk." 11. The curves in backtests look beautiful, but when your account experiences three weeks of continuous value decline, 90% of people will shut down the program and manually adjust parameters. 12. Distinguish whether you are earning alpha or beta. In a bull market, everyone is a quant master; when a bear market comes, only those with beta get washed away. Isolate the long exposure to see the alpha curve; most so-called "strategies" have no alpha at all, they are just a disguised long on BTC with a bit of volatility. 13. There is a lot of false prosperity in ML within quant. LSTM, Transformers, and reinforcement learning are hyped to the sky, but in financial time series with extremely low SNR, a simple momentum factor with reasonable risk control can outperform your XGBoost that you’ve tuned a thousand times. Learning this is really tough; quant is truly a rare skill.
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
Last time I shared this blogger's video, many people said that taking fish oil was very effective for them. What I actually want to express is that the original author has made it very clear... In short, unless you are taking high-dose prescription-grade medical fish oil, all those health supplement types of fish oil bought from Taobao are just a tax on your intelligence... The source of this cognitive gap is that businesses apply the effects of some prescription-grade medications to health supplements, using common marketing tricks...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
I just happened to come across this video, which gives a very concise explanation of why fish oil is a huge marketing scam... Saying that fish oil is effective is like saying that if you do a frog jump forward on your way home, it indeed shortens the distance, but what’s the point...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
Recently, I found a little trick while working on complex projects with Vibe Coding! That is to have the Agent write an optimization log after each modification or optimization, similar to a memory file. At the same time, the project should also include a description file similar to a Soul file, serving as a global guide to help other Agents meet your requirements when taking over the project... Every time a new conversation starts, just let the Agent read these two text files! This way, you won't waste a lot of Tokens at the beginning of each new conversation or task for the AI to take over the project... For small projects, it might not feel like much, but when dealing with a project like mine, where the total code size is close to 100MB, it really wastes the quota...
CryptoPainter
CryptoPainter
The keyword "Openclaw" hasn't been seen for a whole week...
CryptoPainter reposted
pepper 花椒
pepper 花椒
There are already multiple projects asking me to test their AI trading frameworks. Let me just say a few points: 1. Present long-term real trading results; short-term meme coins without max drawdown don't mean anything, it's just survivor bias. Pick any coin that has already gone to zero and backtest it, the curve will look just as beautiful. 2. If the Sharpe ratio > 5, it can basically be determined that it is overfitting, look-ahead bias, or data leakage. Medallion usually only has 2-3, and if you’re getting 7 at home, you should be aware of that. 3. Testing with data from a crypto bull market is different from backtesting with data from major markets; it’s complete overfitting, and I generally don’t consider it. At the very least, it should work through the two bear markets of 2018 and 2022, and then run a walk-forward test to count as a strategy. 4. Transaction fees, slippage, and funding rates must be included. When you layer in Binance's maker/taker fees, VIP tiers, and BNB discounts, if the model is inaccurate, the backtest and real trading can differ by a factor of two in annualized returns, which is normal. 5. Strategy capacity is more worth watching than return rate. Just because it can handle $100,000 doesn’t mean it can handle $1,000,000. The depth of small coins is limited; when you enter the market, you can wipe out your own signals, which the backtest cannot reflect at all. 6. Indeed, crypto quant isn’t that competitive, but arbitrage opportunities are constantly being eroded—funding arbitrage, spot-futures basis, inter-exchange price differences have basically been cleaned out by market makers and HFTs. High-frequency trading is not feasible, and pure factors have no space left; the only paths left are trend and mean reversion. 7. Alpha has a half-life. If a strategy can still run after three months, it’s considered passing; if it lasts six months, it’s considered good; if it lasts a year, it’s likely just luck or your scale hasn’t reached a noticeable level. Don’t mistake the benefits of a single bull run for perpetual alpha; you’re not that impressive yet. 8. The "optimal parameters" from grid search are 99% overfitted. The truly stable parameters are those that can run regardless of the range you pick, not just those that work when fine-tuned to two decimal places. Parameter robustness is a hundred times more important than single-point returns; anyone who has done this understands. 9. The market structures of 2017 ICOs, 2020 DeFi summer, 2021 memes, 2022 LUNA/FTX, and 2023 AI narratives are completely different. The "patterns" you fitted in the previous phase can go to zero in a different regime, and you’ll even lose on fees. 10. Exchange risks are always bigger than you think. FTX going to zero, API rate limits, flash crashes, small exchanges running away, Binance suddenly delisting—these are all "one-time game-enders." You can’t withstand a single exchange disaster with a 50% annualized return; it doesn’t matter how great your strategy is, if you’re trading altcoins, you need to consider liquidity and "delisting risk." 11. The curves in backtests look beautiful, but when your account experiences three weeks of continuous value decline, 90% of people will shut down the program and manually adjust parameters. 12. Distinguish whether you are earning alpha or beta. In a bull market, everyone is a quant master; when a bear market comes, only those with beta get washed away. Isolate the long exposure to see the alpha curve; most so-called "strategies" have no alpha at all, they are just a disguised long on BTC with a bit of volatility. 13. There is a lot of false prosperity in ML within quant. LSTM, Transformers, and reinforcement learning are hyped to the sky, but in financial time series with extremely low SNR, a simple momentum factor with reasonable risk control can outperform your XGBoost that you’ve tuned a thousand times. Learning this is really tough; quant is truly a rare skill.