Blur price

The Dream Computer For A Fully Onchain World. @Somnia_Network calls itself the "onchain entertainment chain." Unlike finance-focused Layer 1s, they have declared their intention to enable large-scale real-time services like gaming, social, and metaverse to operate onchain. The fact that they processed 850 million transactions in just the first month after launching their mainnet on September 2, 2025, supports this ambition. The average fee is around $0.00013, with finality claimed to be under one second, and 60 validators, including Google Cloud, are participating. However, the TVL at the early stage of growth remains around $2 million, and the question of whether they can replicate the "1 million TPS on the testnet" in the real world still lingers. The technical differentiators they present can be grouped into four categories. First, multi-stream consensus. Each validator creates independent data streams in parallel, and a lightweight consensus layer sorts and finalizes them. This approach aims for horizontal scalability by separating production and order, rather than the classical path of "stacking blocks one by one." Second, a low-latency state database called IceDB. It deterministically calculates read/write costs to accurately match gas fees and focuses on reducing bottlenecks in games with frequent state updates. Third, compiled EVM. It increases speed by following a compilation path instead of interpreting bytecode while allowing developers to retain their Ethereum development habits with Solidity, Hardhat, and Foundry. Fourth, streaming compression maximizes data bandwidth, targeting aggressive figures like "300,000 NFT mints per second." In summary, it can be described as "EVM-friendly parallelization and low-latency design," distinct from Solana's parallel execution or Move-based chains. The trajectory since launch is clear. The transaction curve peaked early and stabilized around an average of 12 million transactions per day. The number of active wallets has rapidly increased, but DeFi metrics are still in their infancy. QuickSwap accounts for about half of the chain's TVL, with the rest supported by native DEXs and aggregators, but capital retention is relatively slow compared to the "speed" narrative. On the other hand, there are visible signals in terms of content. Five games launched in the first month of the mainnet, and a public-oriented service like the fan platform involving Tristan Thompson also debuted. With Google Cloud joining as a validator and AI framework partner, game development pipelines such as BigQuery analytics, Mandiant security, and AI NPC toolkits have also been integrated. The ecosystem drive is powered by auxiliary engines. The $10 million Dream Catalyst Fund, an 8-week incubator called Dreamathon, and plans for 24 small hackathons by next year indicate a commitment to creating a continuous pool of creators rather than one-off grants. However, so far, the news has primarily focused on recruitment and calls for participation, and there is a lack of post-factum cases detailing "what was created with this fund and what metrics were achieved." This point becomes a key challenge for future content strategy. In the competitive landscape, Somnia's message is clear. It claims to be faster than Solana, resilient against congestion and interruptions, and offers a familiar EVM development experience compared to Sui and Aptos. However, the TPS peak confirmed on the mainnet (around 149,000) does not reach the testnet figures. Nevertheless, the promise of experiencing a "Ethereum-like experience for gaming" without having to learn unfamiliar Rust or Move, while enjoying ultra-low costs and low latency, is undoubtedly attractive to developers. However, Somnia's uniqueness must be proven as "a truly functioning large-scale onchain game and world" amidst the mature liquidity of Solana, the DeFi depth of Sui and Aptos, and the upcoming EVM performance push from Monad. The risks can be outlined in four areas. First, the gap in scalability proof. Transparent load testing and problem/improvement reports are needed to bridge the numbers between benchmarks and real-world performance. Second, the speed of adoption. Even if transactions are high, if TVL, playtime, and retention do not follow, it will be hard to avoid discussions of inflated metrics. Third, security and decentralization. The mainnet is relatively new, and concerns remain about the concentration of top validators. Fourth, tokenomics. A circulating supply of 16%, potential dilution exceeding six times the FDV, and selling pressure during long-term vesting release periods cast a shadow over medium- to long-term price elasticity. The community's sentiment is "generally bullish." With over 470,000 followers and a creator reward program (Yappers), a steady flow of content is generated. There are many threads that delve deeply into technical topics, and the absence of spam/meme content is a healthy sign. Conversely, the rarity of critical narratives suggests a risk of drifting into an echo chamber. It would be beneficial for official channels to address uncomfortable topics such as centralization, performance gaps, and lockup releases first, leading discussions with data to foster long-term trust. Therefore, Somnia's content and community strategy needs to be refined along three axes. First, a shift in showcase focus. Move the emphasis from "TPS and TX count" to "builder success stories and case studies." Narratives should be built around which studios produced which metrics (concurrent users, session length, costs) with which tools. Second, flattening education. Visualize, analogize, and provide experimental code to make multi-stream, IceDB, and compiled EVM understandable even to non-developers. Third, transparent risk management. Regularly disclose stress test results, incident response drills, validator distribution/slashing data, and token unlock calendars to design "trust beyond numbers." To conclude in a single line: Somnia has placed the long-standing game of "speed and cost" on a new board with EVM-friendly design. Now it is time to prove with data and cases that this board can be filled with an engaging and lasting onchain world. If that is possible, Somnia could establish itself not just as another high-performance L1, but as a fundamental operating system where producers and players meet to 'consume imagination onchain.'

I’ve seen this happen a couple months back. Pudgy fell lower than BAYC. But then recovered quickly higher, ironically because of the same effect. I have multiple years experience on this, and here is my explanation 👇 There is a menu on blur where you can choose the down payment and finance the rest. You could even balance it to have 0% interest. But be careful, the owner or platform of the nft can cancel the loan at any point, so your 0% doesn’t stay too long. Because the 30h timer starts and whichever rate it gets refinanced, that’s your new interest rate. This is where I’ve seen many people lose, because now you have high interest in eth to pay. If the nft does not get refinanced, then you have to give up the collateral, which the nft you bought with financing. Solution to this is to option 1 cancel the loan right away when it gets refinanced, or option 2 pay it back in full. So you lose less on the high interest that it was refinanced at. You can keep repeating this every time a new user refinances at a different rate, this is why you see the same ape on the loan recycling every time until it gets the low desired interest rate, which then it chooses to keep. The idea here is that the price of the APE will outperform the interest rate of the loan. So a collection floor can collapse fast, but build up even faster with leverage. This is not yet available to nfts you buy with apecoin. There are various ways to utilize this function, if you want to learn more, comment what your interest is and I can reply.