It’s the plausible losses that teach the greatest lessons. 📚📝 Last week we had several key levels approach that, at the time, showed strong “sync” and alignment across major charts — making risk-on exposure and entering positions plausible. A clear example was $AVAX: a strong HTF level with clean internal refinements. From the screenshots, you can see how we navigated the trade by reading the technicals, understanding the chart’s context, and assessing whether the level truly held liquidity significance. Then came the wider context — checking for sync and alignment with $USDT.D, #Bitcoin, $ETH, BTC, Total 1, Total 2. From a market-structure-contextualised perspective, the range positioning made the long plausible, and with that alignment, larger risk also became plausible. But as price action unfolded, the lower-timeframe structure and, more importantly, the behaviour of order flow and DOM, told a different truth about who was actually in control. As shown in the screenshots, we de-risked the trade — reducing exposure and managing accordingly for any outcome. Despite the great zone and good sync, the level pierced straight through, revealing that the real intent was already visible in the order flow and DOM before any continuation-down signals printed. There is a lot to unpack from this, and it was all broken down inside @ArchiSuite So much can be learnt from these lessons.