Movement price

in EUR
€0.096949
-- (--)
EUR
We can’t find that one.
Check your spelling or try another.
Market cap
€266.47M
Circulating supply
2.75B / 10B
All-time high
€1.045
24h volume
€17.26M
4.2 / 5

About Movement

New
Official website
White Paper
Github
CertiK
Last audit: --

Disclaimer

The social content on this page ("Content"), including but not limited to tweets and statistics provided by LunarCrush, is sourced from third parties and provided "as is" for informational purposes only. OKX does not guarantee the quality or accuracy of the Content, and the Content does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold digital assets; or (iii) financial, accounting, legal or tax advice. Digital assets, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk, can fluctuate greatly. The price and performance of the digital assets are not guaranteed and may change without notice.

OKX does not provide investment or asset recommendations. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. For further details, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Warning. By using the third-party website ("TPW"), you accept that any use of the TPW will be subject to and governed by the terms of the TPW. Unless expressly stated in writing, OKX and its affiliates (“OKX”) are not in any way associated with the owner or operator of the TPW. You agree that OKX is not responsible or liable for any loss, damage and any other consequences arising from your use of the TPW. Please be aware that using a TPW may result in a loss or diminution of your assets. Product may not be available in all jurisdictions.

Movement’s price performance

Past year
--
--
3 months
-26.59%
€0.13
30 days
-0.97%
€0.10
7 days
+3.07%
€0.09

Movement on socials

Tim哥
Tim哥
The feasibility of Aptos' "AI Era Digital Neural Network" sci-fi narrative As a sci-fi fan, I revisited "Dune" and "The Matrix" during the National Day holiday and suddenly realized that this kind of "sci-fi narrative" is actually the missing piece in the crypto world. So I started to think: if we were to incorporate this narrative into blockchain, who would be the best fit? I ultimately chose @Aptos. Aptos has two key advantages: 👉 First, a solid technical foundation—1M TPS potential, the security of the Move language, and the "neuron-like" structure of parallel execution architecture; 👉 Second, a blank narrative space—currently, the Aptos community emphasizes a pragmatic route of being a "global transaction engine" and lacks a compelling sci-fi narrative. Stories are bridges of emotional connection. In the crypto field, sci-fi narratives have already proven effective: 🔹 @illuviumio secured $32M in funding with an "alien ecology" narrative, accumulating 390,000 fans; 🔹 @ParallelTCG attracted 168,000 users with an "interstellar war" worldview; 🔹 Research shows that 70–80% of users have a positive attitude towards "immersive sci-fi narratives + crypto economy." So I started to wonder: Can we reconstruct @Aptos using power metaphors like in "Dune" or digital awakenings like in "The Matrix"? On-chain nodes become neurons, DeFi protocols are the brain's functional areas, AI agents are awakened digital lives, and data flow is the transmission of neural signals. Such a worldview can help developers, AI enthusiasts, and ordinary users find their place psychologically: they are not just using a chain; they are participating in the construction of a "consciousness network." While other public chains are still talking about throughput, compatibility, and ecosystem size, Aptos can tell a grander story—about the future of connection, awakening, and consciousness. Are you guys looking forward to my sci-fi creation?
TOP 7 ICO | Crypto News & Analytics
TOP 7 ICO | Crypto News & Analytics
Top 10 Biggest Token Unlocks in the Next 7 Days Oct 6–12, 2025 Here are the largest upcoming unlocks to keep on your radar this week $JTO #PORT3 $AVNT $AXS $MOVE $LINEA $HOME $BABY $AGI $APT 🔗 @CryptoRank_io Follow @top7ico to be on top of crypto
Charles💤🎶
Charles💤🎶
The OGs of sandbox games have basically all participated early on. Looking back, let's talk about @Talus_Labs. This design is actually quite ambitious; it’s not just about the slogan of "AI + blockchain," but rather it actively disassembles and reconstructs the underlying logic. First, the technical foundation chose Move + Cosmos SDK, which is a smart move. Move brings security, while Cosmos SDK provides scalability, and the combination perfectly embodies the idea of "L1 + modularization." Coupled with its Nexus architecture, I believe this is the soul of the entire project. It connects on-chain and off-chain workflows, using DAG to record and verify complex AI decisions. This is not just a ledger; it’s a proof layer for decisions. In other words, what Talus aims to solve is not just "data on-chain," but the verifiability of the AI reasoning process. Secondly, it maps AI models, datasets, and computing resources as on-chain assets, which is quite interesting. Traditional Web2 AI models are essentially black boxes; it’s nearly impossible to trace what data was used, how reasoning was derived, and who contributed resources. However, Talus leverages mirror object technology + Walrus protocol storage to make all of this transparent assets. If it really takes off in the future, every AI invocation could break down into a complete ownership chain, which would be a huge trust boost for developers, users, and investors. Now, let’s talk about the ecosystem. CubeSigner, SuiNS, Atoma, Marlin... basically cover the major areas of identity, privacy, security, and verifiable computation. It’s indeed a puzzle, rather than just pulling in random collaborations for show. Especially Atoma and Marlin, one responsible for TEE privacy reasoning and the other for verifiable computation, these are almost Talus's two moats. Talus @Talus_Labs is aiming for a larger track: the global infrastructure layer for trustworthy AI computing. If it can truly make AI decisions transparent, assetized, and modularized, then it’s not just an "AI blockchain," but a brand new AI economic operating system. Talus @Talus_Labs is somewhat like laying the foundation for an "AI national machine"; if successful, it would be the clearing layer for AI trust and value. #talus
Talus Labs
Talus Labs
The SandHouse at Token2049 earlier this week was a hit! We were proud to sponsor such a great event hosted by @TheSandboxGame, and we appreciate everyone who came out to dream big and co-create the future of Web3 ✨

Guides

Find out how to buy Movement
Getting started with crypto can feel overwhelming, but learning where and how to buy crypto is simpler than you might think.
Predict Movement’s prices
How much will Movement be worth over the next few years? Check out the community's thoughts and make your predictions.
View Movement’s price history
Track your Movement’s price history to monitor your holdings’ performance over time. You can easily view the open and close values, highs, lows, and trading volume using the table below.
Own Movement in 3 steps

Create a free OKX account

Fund your account

Choose your crypto

Diversify your portfolio with over 60 euro trading pairs available on OKX

Movement FAQ

Currently, one Movement is worth €0.096949. For answers and insight into Movement's price action, you're in the right place. Explore the latest Movement charts and trade responsibly with OKX.
Cryptocurrencies, such as Movement, are digital assets that operate on a public ledger called blockchains. Learn more about coins and tokens offered on OKX and their different attributes, which includes live prices and real-time charts.
Thanks to the 2008 financial crisis, interest in decentralized finance boomed. Bitcoin offered a novel solution by being a secure digital asset on a decentralized network. Since then, many other tokens such as Movement have been created as well.
Check out our Movement price prediction page to forecast future prices and determine your price targets.

Dive deeper into Movement

Movement Network is an ecosystem of Modular Move-Based Blockchains that enables developers to build secure, performant, and interoperable blockchain applications, bridging the gap between Move and EVM ecosystems.

ESG Disclosure

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.
Asset details
Name
OKCoin Europe Ltd
Relevant legal entity identifier
54930069NLWEIGLHXU42
Name of the crypto-asset
Movement
Consensus Mechanism
Movement is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Movement. The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency.
Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees
Movement is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Movement. The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity.
Beginning of the period to which the disclosure relates
2024-10-03
End of the period to which the disclosure relates
2025-10-03
Energy report
Energy consumption
16283.02765 (kWh/a)
Renewable energy consumption
32.225548601 (%)
Energy intensity
0.00007 (kWh)
Key energy sources and methodologies
To determine the proportion of renewable energy usage, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal energy cost wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Share of electricity generated by renewables - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-electricity-renewables.
Energy consumption sources and methodologies
The energy consumption of this asset is aggregated across multiple components: For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. To determine the energy consumption of a token, the energy consumption of the network(s) ethereum, movement is calculated first. For the energy consumption of the token, a fraction of the energy consumption of the network is attributed to the token, which is determined based on the activity of the crypto-asset within the network. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used - if available - to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.
Emissions report
Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions – Controlled
0.00000 (tCO2e/a)
Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - Purchased
5.41920 (tCO2e/a)
GHG intensity
0.00002 (kgCO2e)
Key GHG sources and methodologies
To determine the GHG Emissions, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal emission wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Carbon intensity of electricity generation - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity Licenced under CC BY 4.0.
Market cap
€266.47M
Circulating supply
2.75B / 10B
All-time high
€1.045
24h volume
€17.26M
4.2 / 5
Easily buy Movement with free deposits via SEPA